Ghostbusters 2016 is not that bad

Ghostbusters 2016 is not that bad. The first trailer was bad. I have gone to an average of 20 movies a year for the past five or six years and I have seen a lot of trailers. That trailer was bad.

Ghostbusters 2016 is not as bad as Sisters or the House. Those movies were terrible, Ghostbusters 2016 is bad and misguided perhaps but not terrible. I would watch a sequel to Ghostbusters 2016 but I wouldn’t watch a sequel to the House or Sisters.

Some of the negative response to Ghostbusters 2016 was partially sexist in nature. To say that sexism played no part in the negative response to Ghostbusters 2016 (GB2016) is a mistake. I have seen worst comedies with a majority male cast that did not get a backlash like GB2016 did.

GB2016 has some faults
  • It copies the original too much
  • Cameos from the original movie cast bog down the film
  • There is one running gag that doesn’t work or was used too often
  • The dumb character is too dumb to live
  • Cameos from the original cast hurt the film at times
Even with all those faults I thought there could be a good sequel made to this film. Melissa McCarthy and Kristin Wig have been better in other films. Leslie Jones was likeable in Top Five. People like Kate McKinion.

If you say a movie ruined your childhood and you are not trying to be funny, you need therapy.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thunder Force was bad

Who’s Harry Crumb is not John Candy’s best film but I liked it

Ghostbusters Frozen Empire is not terrible